Vista more secure than Macs?!?
paul.e.dearment.jr| April 30, 2007 9:13 amIn case your head has been stuck in the sand recently, you probably have heard of the news of an exploit found inside of Quicktime for both Windows and Mac. The author of the exploit(who found and executed it during a contest) originally released details that the exploit was for the Safari browser in Mac, but in an interview acknowledged that he was aware of the true nature of the exploit and kept that information secret(for whatever reason) until another independent company publicly released the information.
That is interesting, but it gets more interesting after that. In an interview with Gregg Keitzer, Din Dai Zovi(the author of the exploit) makes a very interesting statement. Below is one of the questions and Din’s response to the question.
From your research on both platforms, is there a winner between Mac OS X 10.4 and Vista on security?
I have found the code quality, at least in terms of security, to be much better overall in Vista than Mac OS X 10.4. It is obvious from observing affected components in security patches that Microsoft’s Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) has resulted in fewer vulnerabilities in newly-written code. I hope that more software vendors follow their lead in developing proactive software security development methodologies.
Wait! Doesn’t this go against every traditional thought out there. Isn’t it supposed to be the fact that Macs are the most secure thing in the world and they are impervious to attacks? I guess some people just don’t think that anymore. Im actually glad that the smug Mac people have gotten a little taste of reality. It won’t be long before their fantasy world comes crashing down. Thank you Din Dai Zovi.
If you wish to read the article, click here
Categories: Humor, Technology
2 Comments »

